TWO of the five seats on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the main Wall Street regulator, are about to be filled. The process is a partisan one, with Barack Obama, a Democrat, picking one new commissioner and the Republican leadership of the Senate the other. That, naturally, is a recipe for discord at an already bruised agency. Its clout has diminished thanks to its poor oversight of investment banks before the financial crisis, to say nothing of its failure to spot the Ponzi scheme of one Bernard Madoff. Now new research suggests that the SEC is doing less well at its main job—policing firms that list shares or issue bonds, among other investments—than its own data suggest.
Start with the new commissioners. Even as the SEC’s standing among regulators has diminished, the Dodd-Frank act of 2010, which overhauled financial regulation in America, has added to its responsibilities, from gathering better data on corporate pay to supervising credit-rating agencies. The two new arrivals are likely to undermine, or at least complicate, much of this additional work. That is because the two nominees, who have yet to be approved by the Senate,...Continue reading
from Economics http://ift.tt/1XSDTZt
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment